linux-kernel - [patch 0/5] perf stat --log-fd=N

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed,  7 Sep 2011 17:13:59 -0600
From:	Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 0/5] perf stat --log-fd=N

hi Arnaldo,

Heres the "update" to the patchset I promised.

[PATCH 1/5] perf stat: add --log-fd <N> option to redirect stderr
[PATCH 2/5] perf-stat: fix +- nan% in --no-aggr runs
[PATCH 3/5] perf stat: suppress printing std-dev when its 0
[PATCH 4/5] perf stat: allow tab as cvs delimiter
[PATCH 5/5] perf stat: fix spelling in comment

Ive dropped the 'print-ops' patches for a few reasons:

- pretty and cvs outputs have diverged further, pretty has added info,
  cvs has dropped the final timing line (probably cuz it didnt fit in
  the table). I presume there are good reasons for this.

- Id be parsing with perl anyway, so cvs regularity isnt important, and
  the richer info in pretty mode is useful.

- fiddling with output format is just as likely to break somebodys parsing,
  minor aesthetic improvements arent worth it. Its easier to do nothing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/