linux-kernel - Re: [patch] mm: memcg: close race between charge and putback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110908181901.1d488d73.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:19:01 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: memcg: close race between charge and putback

On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:54:04 +0200
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 05:30:42PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Thu,  8 Sep 2011 09:40:22 +0200
> > Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > There is a potential race between a thread charging a page and another
> > > thread putting it back to the LRU list:
> > > 
> > > charge:                         putback:
> > > SetPageCgroupUsed               SetPageLRU
> > > PageLRU && add to memcg LRU     PageCgroupUsed && add to memcg LRU
> > > 
> > 
> > I assumed that all pages are charged before added to LRU.
> > (i.e. event happens in charge->lru_lock->putback order.)
> > 
> > But hmm, this assumption may be bad for maintainance.
> > Do you find a code which adds pages to LRU before charge ?
> > 
> > Hmm, if there are codes which recharge the page to other memcg,
> > it will cause bug and my assumption may be harmful.
> 
> Swap slots are read optimistically into swapcache and put to the LRU,
> then charged upon fault.  

Yes, then swap charge removes page from LRU before charge.
IIUC, it needed to do so because page->mem_cgroup may be replaced.

> Fuse apparently recharges uncharged LRU pages.
Yes and No. IIUC, it was like page migraion and remove old page 
and add new page to radix-tree.

> That's why we have the lrucare stuff in the first place, no?
You're right.

> Or did I misunderstand your question?
> 

I just wondered whether you find a new one or possible user.

Thanks,
-Kame


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/