[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110908165239.120f25c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:52:39 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, joe@...ches.com, jim.cromie@...il.com,
bvanassche@....org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dynamic_debug: use a single printk() to emit msgs
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:28:50 -0400
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com> wrote:
> We were using KERN_CONT to combine msgs with their prefix. However,
> KERN_CONT is not smp safe, in the sense that it can interleave messages.
> This interleaving can result in printks coming out at the wrong loglevel.
> With the high frequency of printks, that dynamic debug can produce, this
> is not desirable.
>
> Thus, make dynamic_emit_prefix(), fill a char buf[64], instead
> of doing a printk directly. If we enable printing out of
> function, module, line, or pid info, they are placed in this
> 64 byte buffer. In my testing 64 bytes was enough size to fulfill
> all requests. Even if its not, we can match up the printk itself
> to see where its from, so to me this is no big deal.
>
> ...
>
> +#define LEFT(wrote) ((PREFIX_SIZE - wrote) > 0) ? (PREFIX_SIZE - wrote) : 0
This macro will misbehave if passed an expression with side effects and
is rather ugly and didn't actually need to be implemented as a macro at
all.
This?
--- a/lib/dynamic_debug.c~dynamic_debug-use-a-single-printk-to-emit-messages-fix
+++ a/lib/dynamic_debug.c
@@ -423,31 +423,39 @@ static int ddebug_exec_query(char *query
}
#define PREFIX_SIZE 64
-#define LEFT(wrote) ((PREFIX_SIZE - wrote) > 0) ? (PREFIX_SIZE - wrote) : 0
+
+static int remaining(int wrote)
+{
+ if (PREFIX_SIZE - wrote > 0)
+ return PREFIX_SIZE - wrote;
+ return 0;
+}
static char *dynamic_emit_prefix(const struct _ddebug *desc, char *buf)
{
int pos_after_tid;
int pos = 0;
- pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEFT(pos), "%s", KERN_DEBUG);
+ pos += snprintf(buf + pos, remaining(pos), "%s", KERN_DEBUG);
if (desc->flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_TID) {
if (in_interrupt())
- pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEFT(pos), "%s ",
+ pos += snprintf(buf + pos, remaining(pos), "%s ",
"<intr>");
else
- pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEFT(pos), "[%d] ",
+ pos += snprintf(buf + pos, remaining(pos), "[%d] ",
task_pid_vnr(current));
}
pos_after_tid = pos;
if (desc->flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_MODNAME)
- pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEFT(pos), "%s:", desc->modname);
+ pos += snprintf(buf + pos, remaining(pos), "%s:",
+ desc->modname);
if (desc->flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_FUNCNAME)
- pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEFT(pos), "%s:", desc->function);
+ pos += snprintf(buf + pos, remaining(pos), "%s:",
+ desc->function);
if (desc->flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_LINENO)
- pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEFT(pos), "%d:", desc->lineno);
+ pos += snprintf(buf + pos, remaining(pos), "%d:", desc->lineno);
if (pos - pos_after_tid)
- pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEFT(pos), " ");
+ pos += snprintf(buf + pos, remaining(pos), " ");
if (pos >= PREFIX_SIZE)
buf[PREFIX_SIZE - 1] = '\0';
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists