| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 20:02:11 +0200 From: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@....icnet.pl> To: "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.1-rc1] ARM: entry: fix wrong parameter used in do_thumb_abort On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 at 19:58:47 Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 at 13:47:40 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:10:08PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > > > Any special requirements as to the process of submitting bug > > > fixes against arch/arm common bits? > > > > It needs to go into the patch system for merging so that it doesn't > > get buried and forgotten - as already demonstrated. > > Still not sure: am I suppposed to do something for the patch to go to > the patch system? Or do you take care of this? OK, instead of waiting for your answer, I've found an interface to your patch system myself and submitted the patch. Next time, for how long after posting a patch to the linux-arm-kernel lists should I wait for comments before I can submit it to the patch system even if there are no signs of the patch being reviewed? IOW, can I assume you accept a patch if you don't comment it for a certain period of time? Thanks, Janusz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists