[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E680A5D.7050903@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:20:45 +1000
From: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"trivial@...nel.org" <trivial@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][REPOST] Check maxlen on strnlen_user usage
On 08/09/11 10:06, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:54:18 +1000
> Ryan Mallon<rmallon@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> strnlen_user returns the length of the string including the nul
>> terminator. In the case where maxlen is reached strnlen_user returns
>> maxlen + 1. Most callsites already check for this condition. Fix the
>> call to strnlen_user in fs/exec.c to check for the maxlen case.
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
>> index 25dcbe5..e19588c 100644
>> --- a/fs/exec.c
>> +++ b/fs/exec.c
>> @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static int copy_strings(int argc, struct
>> user_arg_ptr argv,
>> goto out;
>>
>> len = strnlen_user(str, MAX_ARG_STRLEN);
>> - if (!len)
>> + if (!len || len> MAX_ARG_STRLEN)
>> goto out;
>>
>> ret = -E2BIG;
> The following call to vald_arg_len() already does this?
>
> This change will cause copy_strings() to incorrectly return -EFAULT,
> rather than -E2BIG.
Hmm, missed that. How about the patch below instead which passes the
correct length to strnlen_user?
> Your email client is wordwrapping and space-stuffing the patches, btw.
I'll try again. Hopefully it works this time.
---
Replace valid_arg_len function in fs/exec.c with max_arg_len function
and pass the correct length to strnlen_user.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index e19588c..12d2f7f 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -296,9 +296,9 @@ err:
return err;
}
-static bool valid_arg_len(struct linux_binprm *bprm, long len)
+static long max_arg_len(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
- return len<= MAX_ARG_STRLEN;
+ return MAX_ARG_STRLEN;
}
#else
@@ -354,9 +354,9 @@ static int __bprm_mm_init(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
return 0;
}
-static bool valid_arg_len(struct linux_binprm *bprm, long len)
+static long max_arg_len(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
- return len<= bprm->p;
+ return bprm->p;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
@@ -474,18 +474,19 @@ static int copy_strings(int argc, struct user_arg_ptr argv,
const char __user *str;
int len;
unsigned long pos;
+ long max_len = max_arg_len(bprm);
ret = -EFAULT;
str = get_user_arg_ptr(argv, argc);
if (IS_ERR(str))
goto out;
- len = strnlen_user(str, MAX_ARG_STRLEN);
- if (!len || len> MAX_ARG_STRLEN)
+ len = strnlen_user(str, max_len);
+ if (!len)
goto out;
ret = -E2BIG;
- if (!valid_arg_len(bprm, len))
+ if (len> max_len)
goto out;
/* We're going to work our way backwords. */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists