[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:02:43 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, gregkh@...e.de,
jim.cromie@...il.com, bvanassche@....org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dynamic_debug: consolidate repetitive struct
_ddebug descriptor definitions
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 20:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:13:16 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 16:52 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:28:41 -0400
> > > Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > > Replace the repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions with
> > > > a new DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_META_DATA(name, fmt) macro.
> > > > +#define DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(name, fmt) \
> > > > + static struct _ddebug __used __aligned(8) \
> > > > + __attribute__((section("__verbose"))) name = { \
> > > > + .modname = KBUILD_MODNAME, \
> > > > + .function = __func__, \
> > > > + .filename = __FILE__, \
> > > > + .format = (fmt), \
> > > > + .lineno = __LINE__, \
> > > > + .flags = _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT, \
> > > > + .enabled = false, \
> > > > + }
> > > <anal>That macro implements a definition, not a declaration</anal>
> > Andrew, that's not quite true
> It's precisely true.
Not according to the c99 standard section 6.7
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists