[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:55:08 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...radead.org>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc: vinod.koul@...el.com, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"workgroup.linux@....com" <workgroup.linux@....com>,
"rongjun.ying@....com" <rongjun.ying@....com>,
"Baohua.Song@....com" <Baohua.Song@....com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: add CSR SiRFprimaII DMAC driver
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:52 +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> >
> > Actually, there is no real case for xlen > dma_width. this picture is
> > only explaining what will happen if we set xlen > dma_width.
> > when xlen > dma_width, for every line, dma will transfer only
> > dma_width. Then the extra data is wrapped around
> > to the next data line, it will corrupt the DMA transfer for
> > multiple-line 2-D DMA since the extra data will overlap with the real
> > next line.
> >
> > if we set ylen to 0, the DMA becomes 1D, the wrap-around of the extra
> > data has no issue nobody will overlap with it.
> >
>
> For example, if we set xlen = 7, dma_width =4, ylen > 0
> then dma will happen like:
> 0~6
> 4~10
> 8~14
> 12~18
> ....
Is there a real world use case of this??
>
> But for ylen=0, it has no issue. there is no next line to overlap with
> the extra data.
>
> in case we set xlen = 0, something funny will happen:
> i will copy the same memory again and again(ylen+1 times).
--
~Vinod Koul
Intel Corp.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists