[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 13:37:52 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: "Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>
cc: "penberg@...nel.org" <penberg@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] slub Discard slab page only when node partials > minimum
setting
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Alex,Shi wrote:
> BTW, some testing results for your PCP SLUB:
>
> for hackbench process testing:
> on WSM-EP, inc ~60%, NHM-EP inc ~25%
> on NHM-EX, inc ~200%, core2-EP, inc ~250%.
> on Tigerton-EX, inc 1900%, :)
There is no minus on tigerton. I hope that is not a regression?
>
> for hackbench thread testing:
> on WSM-EP, no clear inc, NHM-EP no clear inc
> on NHM-EX, inc 10%, core2-EP, inc ~20%.
> on Tigertion-EX, inc 100%,
> for netperf loopback testing, no clear performance change.
Hmmm... The sizes of the per cpu partial objects could be varied a bit to
see if more would make an impact.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists