| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:28:47 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com> To: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk> Cc: Jesper Andersen <jespera@...u.dk>, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Backporting the Linux kernel, for good - was: Re: semantic patch inference On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk> wrote: >> > I guess that the patch that spdiff will receive will already contain the >> > appropriate #ifs, so we don't have to be concerned about them. >> >> That is correct. >> >> > We just add them in as is. >> >> I do not follow, add what? > > Sorry. The + code. The #ifdefs ad the compatibility code. We don't have > to interpret it, so we don't care whether it is only related to kernel > version numbers or something more complex. Ah yes, indeed! Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists