linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] [PATCH 02/62] mpu401:snd_mpu401_uart_new(): split semantic of irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:31:43 +0800
From:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To:	Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
	Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 02/62] mpu401:snd_mpu401_uart_new(): split semantic
 of irq_flags

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:27:43PM +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Yong Zhang wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:58:45PM +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > > ...
> > > Here, "no interrupt" and "already reserved" actually mean the same thing,
> > > i.e., that the interrupt handling is the responsibility of some other
> > > driver.
> 
> Sorry, after checking the code, I've realized that my description was
> wrong.  irq_flags==0 ("already reserved") means that snd_mpu401_uart_new
> should not try to allocate the interrupt, while irq==-1 ("no interrupt")
> means that the device never issues mpu401 interrupts, so that the mpu401
> code must use a timer to poll the device.
> 
> I'll write a patch that changes this function so that irq<0 means
> "already reserved", and that "no interrupt" gets another bit in the
> info_flags parameter.

Sounds good.

So my patch will be based on yours; or if you have other plan,
how about let's take this patch as a temporary workaroud?

Anyway, you decide it :)

Thanks,
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/