linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] at91: changes for next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201109102306.58340.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:06:58 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	"Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Josef Holzmayr <holzmayr@...-elektrotechnik.de>,
	Nico Erfurth <ne@...urth.eu>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: changes for next

On Friday 09 September 2011, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Can you please pull the following changes since commit ddf28352b80c86754a6424e3a61e8bdf9213b3c7:
> 
>   Linux 3.1-rc5 (2011-09-04 15:45:10 -0700)
> 
> They are available in the git repository at:
>   git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git  at91-next
> 
> They have been present on linux-arm-kernel for some time and where recently added in linux-next.
> Stephen resolved some trivial conflicts relatives to the removal of a board file (Cf:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/9/96 ).
> 
> A series by Thomas is touching the USB subsystem: ohci-at91.c but as most of changes are in the at91 directory, it makes more sense to take them in arm-soc.

Hi Nicolas,

I've resumed pulling patches and uploaded them to git.linaro.org while
master.kernel.org continues to be unavailable.

I've decided to split your branch into two separate branches 'board'
and 'devel' to better match the code from other soc trees in a way
that I can send forward to Linus. Please check that the split trees
actually make sense, and tell me if that's ok for you or if you would
prefer them split differently.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/