[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E6B7985.5080709@vflare.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:51:49 -0400
From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Robert Jennings <rcj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Driver Project <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] zram: Set initial disksize to some default value
On 09/09/2011 08:42 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:18:56PM -0400, Nitin Gupta wrote:
>> On 09/09/2011 07:12 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 07:01:04PM -0400, Nitin Gupta wrote:
>>>> Currently, we set initial disksize as 0, which forces
>>>> user to write some value to corresponding zram device's
>>>> sysfs node, before the device can be used. Now, we avoid
>>>> this step by providing some default size initially.
>>>>
>>>> To change the disksize, user must:
>>>> - Reset disk.
>>>> Ex: echo 1 > /sys/block/zram0/reset
>>>> (NOTE: disksize is set to the default value after reset)
>>>>
>>>> - Set new disksize.
>>>> Ex: echo $((256*1024*1024)) > /sys/block/zram0/disksize
>>>
>>> So, what tools just broke with this change?
>>>
>>> And where is the sysfs file documentation change that should go along
>>> with this?
>>>
>>
>>
>> This change does not change any sysfs names or behavior, so does not
>> break any scripts that assume the current behavior. I also verified that
>> sysfs documentation (ABI/testing/sysfs-block-zram) need not be changed
>> and same with drivers/staging/zram/zram.txt.
>
> Huh, you just said the behavior changed as described in your comment
> above. You said the user no longer has to do a step to accomplish
> something. What happens if they do do that after this patch?
>
The current documentation states that:
"" (from drivers/staging/zram/zram.txt)
2) Set Disksize (Optional):
Set disk size by writing the value to sysfs node 'disksize'
(in bytes). If disksize is not given, default value of 25%
of RAM is used.
""
So existing code did not correctly implement this behavior -- user had
to set a disksize for zram to be usable. With this patch, the code now
behaves exactly as described in documentation. So, we now avoid the
extra step of setting a disksize as documented. The user can still, of
course, set another disk value if needed.
So, in summary, no documentation changes are required with this change.
I will also add this explanation in changelog when submitting v4 patches.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists