linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top of UBI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E6C8F09.4060806@free-electrons.com>
Date:	Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:35:53 +0200
From:	David Wagner <david.wagner@...e-electrons.com>
To:	dedekind1@...il.com
CC:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-embedded <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top of UBI

On 11/09/2011 12:18, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 16:41 +0200, David Wagner wrote:
>>> 1. Stick with the own cdev approach - the driver becomes very simple
>>>     in this case - we review it.
>>
>> This is the way it's implemented in v4, right ?
>
> Yes, but I though I sent you some feed back with minor things as well as
> with major issue related to race condigions: you should keep the UBI
> volume open as long as your block device is referenced, to prevent the
> UBI volume from being removed.
>

Ah, yes, of course.  I made these changes and will send them monday.

Regards,
David.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/