[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110911013742.GJ29319@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:37:42 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, rjw@...k.pl, paul@...lmenage.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] freezer: kill unused set_freezable_with_signal()
Hello, Matt.
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 11:01:59AM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> Looking at the code and docs I realize I didn't explicitly mention that
> kthreads could not be frozen by the cgroup freezer. However, the code did
> not allow it. When freezing tasks the cgroup freezer always did:
>
> freeze_task(task, true)
>
> which would only freeze tasks without PF_FREEZER_NOSIG due to the second
> "sig_only" parameter. I believe this means it could not be used to
> freeze kthreads.
>
> My feeling is kthreads should not be "managed" directly by userspace.
> Especially if that includes the ability to arbitrarily stop or freeze them.
> So it seems more appropriate to explicitly disallow freezing of kthreads
> via the cgroup freezer.
Oh yeah, that's what we should do and maybe that's what the current
code intends to achieve too but currently it ends up triggering
BUG_ON().
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists