[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110912133826.GA22548@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:38:26 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bharrosh@...asas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: export __make_request
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 02:26:52PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > What happens to the existing blk_make_request?
>
> I ended up naming __make_request() blk_queue_bio() instead.
I really hate naming things different from the method they are
implementing. I've tried to figure out what the point of the
old blk_make_request is - why would we not go through
generic_make_request for this?
Boaz, any idea?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists