[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E6E1693.7080606@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:26:27 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/5] llist: Remove cpu_relax() usage in cmpxchg loops
On 09/12/2011 05:05 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Subject: llist: Remove cpu_relax() usage in cmpxchg loops
> From: Peter Zijlstra<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Date: Mon Sep 12 15:50:49 CEST 2011
>
> Initial benchmarks show they're a net loss (2 socket wsm):
>
> $ for i in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor ; do echo performance> $i; done
> $ echo 4096 32000 64 128> /proc/sys/kernel/sem
> $ ./sembench -t 2048 -w 1900 -o 0
>
We hyperthreading enabled, and were all threads loaded? cpu_relax
allows the other thread to make more progress while the spinner relaxes.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists