[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110912163812.GE5887@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:38:12 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wm831x-spi: use id_table rather hand rolled variant
handling
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 05:45:02PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> The spi subsystem supports device tables nowadays, so use it.
>
> Only build tested as I don't have the hw.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
Non-bugfix patches like this should always be submitted against the
latest code in -next unless the subsystem is being unusual. I can tell
you're not working against the latest -next becuase it has a version of
this in it already. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists