[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hvcsy6nr2.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:47:29 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 02/62] mpu401:snd_mpu401_uart_new(): split semantic of irq_flags
At Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:10:36 +0200,
Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>
> diff --git a/sound/isa/als100.c b/sound/isa/als100.c
> index 20becc8..3355609 100644
> --- a/sound/isa/als100.c
> +++ b/sound/isa/als100.c
> @@ -245,18 +245,22 @@ static int __devinit snd_card_als100_probe(int dev,
>
> if (mpu_port[dev] > 0 && mpu_port[dev] != SNDRV_AUTO_PORT) {
> int mpu_type = MPU401_HW_ALS100;
> + int mpu_flags = 0;
>
> - if (mpu_irq[dev] == SNDRV_AUTO_IRQ)
> + if (mpu_irq[dev] == SNDRV_AUTO_IRQ) {
> mpu_irq[dev] = -1;
> + mpu_flags = MPU401_INFO_RX_POLL;
> + }
When mpu_irq[dev] is set to -1, it won't work.
Instead of setting mpu_flag in this if block, you'd need another check
of mpu_irq[], i.e.
if (mpu_irq[dev] == SNDRV_AUTO_IRQ)
mpu_irq[dev] = -1;
if (mpu_irq[dev] < 0)
mpu_flags = MPU401_INFO_RX_POLL;
The similar problems are found in other places, too.
thanks,
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists