[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110913211154.fe53ca8c1d608def77a69022@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:11:54 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Xen Devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:54:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:12:33 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 08/25/2011 04:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Stephen: the x86/spinlocks branch in the -tip tree is obsolete and
> > >> should be dropped.
> > >
> > > That's a bit tricky as I get a rolled up tip tree. The best I could do
> > > is revert the commit that merges the x86/spinlocks branch into
> > > auto-latest ... I'll do that for today (unless something happens to the
> > > tip tree in the next hour).
> > >
> >
> > OK, let me bother Ingo about it.
>
> For today, I have done "git revert -m 1 6f8fa39c81f1" after merging the
> tip tree.
I am still doing this in each linux-next, and it doesn't appear to have
been fixed up the the tree on tesla.tglx.de, yet, I think.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists