[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110913120716.1b893c483ee91d6b7f12a5b4@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:07:16 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Temporary -rcu tree location
Hi Paul,
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:34:00 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > there doesn't seem to be 'rcu/next' branch, right?
>
> No, there is not. So the idea is to push "rcu/next" the first time,
> then ":rcu/next" thereafter?
Can't you just do a (forced) push over and over again without removing
the branch each time?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists