[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2aaa89t1m.fsf@bob.laptop.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:49:25 -0400
From: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: SDHCI regression since 2.6.39
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> If it is running, and not helping, can I persuade you to try a full
>> bisection?
>
> OK, will do.
Thank you!
>> I don't think we have other reports of this bug, and the
>> only other person who has reported something like it wasn't a kernel
>> hacker.
>
> That's interesting; the X220 is a pretty common machine these days, I
> think. I wonder if there's variations in the SD controller or something?
I just asked Matthew Garrett to check his X220, and his has the same e823
controller as you, is running a 3.1-rc kernel, and everything's working.
So it's not even variation in the controller model, it's something even
more subtle. Perhaps try some different cards? What capacity/speed is
the one you're trying? If there is a per-card difference, I suppose
we'd expect it to be that slower cards work and faster cards fail
(given the nature of the patch I linked in my last mail).
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists