[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E6FA8AE.5010308@xenotime.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:02:06 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend][Trivial] Match on_each_cpu behaviour on UP to
SMP
On 09/07/11 23:57, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> The comment in the SMP implementation of on_each_cpu says:
> "May be used during early boot while
> early_boot_irqs_disabled is set. Use local_irq_save/restore() instead
> of local_irq_disable/enable()."
>
> but the existing UP macro version uses local_irq_disable/enable().
>
> Do the safe thing - make the UP version match the SMP one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
> CC: Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/smp.h | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
> index 8cc38d3..7c9b9d4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/smp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/smp.h
> @@ -127,9 +127,10 @@ static inline int up_smp_call_function(smp_call_func_t func, void *info)
> (up_smp_call_function(func, info))
> #define on_each_cpu(func,info,wait) \
> ({ \
> - local_irq_disable(); \
> + unsigned long __flags; \
> + local_irq_save(__flags); \
> func(info); \
> - local_irq_enable(); \
> + local_irq_retore(__flags); \
You tested that? ^^^^^^
> 0; \
> })
> static inline void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu) { }
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists