[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110913211911.GA13894@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:19:11 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bharrosh@...asas.com, nab@...ux-iscsi.org, ryanh@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: export __make_request
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 08:04:46PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > I really hate naming things different from the method they are
> > implementing. I've tried to figure out what the point of the
> > old blk_make_request is - why would we not go through
> > generic_make_request for this?
> >
> > Boaz, any idea?
>
> I tend to agree, we could rename the existing blk_make_request(). It
> could be blk_make_request_from_bio() or something like that, since
> that's what it does.
It should at very least be renamed. But I still can't figure out what
it is for exactly.
There are three users:
(1) virtio_blk::virtblk_get_id():
This looks like it really should just use blk_rq_map_kern.
(2) osd_initiator::_make_request():
This one looks like it should just use the same scheme as
sg_io(), as it's doing the same thing.
(3) target_core_pscsi::__pscsi_map_SG():
Same as (2).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists