linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 34/49] gma500: the GEM and GTT code is device independant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110913091508.6fb35d0c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:15:08 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, greg@...ah.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/49] gma500: the GEM and GTT code is device
 independant

> I recall seeing the GMA driver using the TTM at some point
> (but then those calls disappared),

The base code it came from still had bits of TTM stuff in that I was
eliminating. The driver itself doesn't use TTM. It's GEM based and uses
GEM extensively.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/