lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADpTngUMit0sqSvYTCwML_Azk=vsYLGCnW9RBRyDs8Ruxs=SRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:39:29 +0200
From:	Fabio Coatti <fabio.coatti@...il.com>
To:	Lin Ming <mlin@...pku.edu.cn>
Cc:	Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [3.1-rc4] vfs_rmdir() -> mutex_unlock() Oops

2011/9/14 Lin Ming <mlin@...pku.edu.cn>:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:17:00PM -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:24:20PM -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
>>>
>>> > This box primarily does most of its VFS stuff over lots of NFS mounts,
>>> > but has some local EXT3 filesystems. This has happened a couple of times:
>>> >
>>> > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000b8
>>>...
>>> Got a few more identical Oopses on another box running slightly past
>>> 3.1-rc5 (79016f648872549392d232cd648bd02298c2d2bb). It seems to be
>>> do_rmdir()'s mutex_unlock() call.
>>>
>>> I'm building -rc6 with CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES now.
>>
>> ...and not much more help with CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES, from 3.1-rc6:
>>
>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000a4
>> IP: [<ffffffff816adc93>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x53/0x140
>> PGD 13c6c4067 PUD 2256fc067 PMD 0
>> Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
>> CPU 2
>> Modules linked in: ipmi_devintf ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler xt_recent nf_conntrack_ftp xt_state xt_owner nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 bnx2
>>
>> Pid: 27658, comm: php Not tainted 3.1.0-rc6-hw-mudbg+ #32 Dell Inc. PowerEdge 1950/0TT740
>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff816adc93>]  [<ffffffff816adc93>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x53/0x140
>> RSP: 0018:ffff8800b65e1e28  EFLAGS: 00010046
>> RAX: 0000000000000100 RBX: ffff88001bcece48 RCX: ffff88001bd05348
>> RDX: 0000000040000200 RSI: ffff8800916cf6c0 RDI: 00000000000000a0
>> RBP: ffff8800b65e1e48 R08: 00000000043205bc R09: ffffea00011340c0
>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 00000000000000a0
>> R13: 00000000000000a4 R14: 0000000000000246 R15: 00007f7fe2d15680
>> FS:  00007f7fe2e1f720(0000) GS:ffff88022fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> CR2: 00000000000000a4 CR3: 0000000215c16000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
>> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> Process php (pid: 27658, threadinfo ffff8800b65e0000, task ffff8800175d4320)
>> Stack:
>>  ffff88001bcece48 00000000fffffffe ffff8800916cf6c0 00007f7fe2d146a8
>>  ffff8800b65e1e58 ffffffff816add89 ffff8800b65e1e88 ffffffff8110ec70
>>  ffff8800b65e1e98 ffff8800916cf6c0 ffff8800b65e1e98 0000000000000000
>> Call Trace:
>>  [<ffffffff816add89>] mutex_unlock+0x9/0x10
>>  [<ffffffff8110ec70>] vfs_rmdir+0xb0/0x100
>>  [<ffffffff8110ed96>] do_rmdir+0xd6/0x130
>>  [<ffffffff81102063>] ? fput+0x1c3/0x260
>>  [<ffffffff810fe648>] ? filp_close+0x68/0xa0
>>  [<ffffffff8110ee41>] sys_rmdir+0x11/0x20
>>  [<ffffffff816b6f3b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>> Code: 75 1b 65 48 8b 04 25 c8 b5 00 00 48 63 80 44 e0 ff ff a9 00 ff ff 07 0f 85 bb 00 00 00 9c 41 5e fa b8 00 01 00 00 4d 8d 6c 24 04 <f0> 66 41 0f c1 45 00 38 e0 74 08 f3 90 41 8a 45 00 eb f4 44 8b
>> RIP  [<ffffffff816adc93>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x53/0x140
>>  RSP <ffff8800b65e1e28>
>> CR2: 00000000000000a4
>> ---[ end trace f515ec8376bdb799 ]---
>>
>> How can I further debug this? At this point, it seems to be happening several times daily.
>
> Fabio reported a similar bug,
> 3.0.3 [BUG] unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
> http://marc.info/?t=131416920900001&r=1&w=2
>
> Do you have a test case to trigger this bug reliably?

Unfortunatey not, so far. This problem happens on a quite loaded
server with apache on it and it is difficult to find root cause or at
least a situation able to trigger it. Still digging, but I wouldn't
expect to find something useful in short time.



-- 
Fabio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ