linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET cgroup] extend threadgroup locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110914183354.GA16922@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:33:54 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl, paul@...lmenage.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
	matthltc@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup] extend threadgroup locking

Hi Tejun,

On 09/11, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Oleg, this one definitely needs your review.  The original thread is...
>
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1187853/focus=1188347

OK, I'll try to read it this week when I get recovered, I am ill now.

But I got lost... What about

	http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1184375

which I didn't read yet? It seems that they conflict with each other.

Should I ignore the series above? Probably yes, it surely conflicts
with the task-counter patches in -mm.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/