| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA7ZZGB5TPFQi4NeN6XQakArOOHrDqoJYVhyOz5ZUEMJwQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:22:05 -0400 From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com> To: Bob Tracy <rct@...rkin.frus.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: stupid git question On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Bob Tracy <rct@...rkin.frus.com> wrote: > Subject says a mouthful, but I digress... > > Pointed "git" at Linus' github.com repository to pull the "-rc6" > changes (git pull <repo_url>). Seems to have worked, except I received > no updated tags: the latest tag in my local repo copy is "v3.1-rc4". > > Is this an expected consequence of doing the initial clone operation > from one repo, and then pulling updates from another that, in theory, is > identical to the first? If so, is there an officially sanctioned method > of switching repositories that doesn't require blowing away the local > copy and doing another "git clone"? Do a git fetch --tags <repo url> and you'll get the tags too. josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists