[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110914225825.GA13421@huya.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:58:25 -0700
From: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:55:33AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:18:53 -0700 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > The device tree machine description also needs to have the .fixup and
> > .reserve callbacks added to it so that the device tree machines boot
> > properly. Perhaps the soc tree needs to pull in Russell's tree at some
> > point to resolve this subtle logical conflict or when the trees are
> > merged together someone will need to do an evil merge and add the
> > callbacks in the merge commit.
>
> Ah, right. I have added this merge fixup for today and can carry it as
> necessary.
Arnd, how do you want to handle this? It's a simple patch, but only
applies to the merge of Russell's tree and the soc tree.
Thanks,
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists