[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110915101643.GA10802@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:16:43 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <leo@...xarxa.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org,
630593@...s.debian.org, Nicos Gollan <gollan@...ormatik.uni-kl.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Alexander Gordeev <lasaine@....cs.msu.su>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] parport_pc: remove ancient, overeager quirk that
disables EPP support on many chipsets
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:33:18AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there's a bug in the parport module that have been reported (in another
> places) some time ago [1]. Also, this bug was reported at Redhat [2], but
> nobody follow the report and it was closed.
>
> As Adam baked said [1] :
>
> <quote>
> A long time ago (~ 10 years), Intel produced a chipset that
> included broken EPP support. The Linux parport driver was written to detect
> such a chipset and disable EPP support on it. Unfortunately the test that was
> written gives false positives for many current chipsets and no-one seems to
> know exactly what the problem hardware was, let alone have a sample of it to
> see if a better test can be written. After such a long time it is probably
> appropriate to just remove the test (on average it does more harm than good)
> however you are correct in asserting the driver is unmaintained so no-one is
> bothering to fix it.
> </quote>
>
> I have applied the patch to the standard debian kernel and vanilla kernels and
> runs perfectly. The patch simply erases a check. Applied to some Dell
> hardware, now the EPP mode is detected and, after some initial tests it's
> working.
>
> Please, apply the patch.
Please resend it with the proper Signed-off-by: line, as described by
Documentation/SubmittingPatches and we will be glad to consider it.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists