[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E721595.9040108@metafoo.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:11:17 +0200
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Dimitris Papastamos <dp@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
Samuel Oritz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6 v3] regmap: Introduce caching support
Tested-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de> (for REGCACHE_NONE and
REGCACHE_RBTREE)
Some minor comments though:
> -
> +/**
> + * regcache_read: Fetch the value of a given register from the cache.
> + *
> + * @map: map to configure.
> + * @reg: The register index.
> + * @value: The value to be returned.
> + *
> + * Return a negative value on failure, 0 on success.
> + */
> +int regcache_read(struct regmap *map,
> + unsigned int reg, unsigned int *value)
> +{
> + unsigned int max_reg;
> +
> + if (map->cache_type == REGCACHE_NONE)
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!map->cache_ops);
> +
> + if (!regmap_readable(map, reg))
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + if (map->max_register)
> + max_reg = map->max_register;
> + else
> + max_reg = map->num_cache_defaults_raw;
In my opinion we should initialize max_register to num_cache_defaults_raw if it
is not set during initialization instead of doing this check each time. Also
regmap_readable already checks whether the register is in the register range,
so there is no need to repeat the check here.
> +
> +
> + if (reg < max_reg && !regmap_volatile(map, reg))
> + return map->cache_ops->read(map, reg, value);
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regcache_read);
> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists