lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4fc342c27daa84e68a93a59d5206a168.squirrel@www.microway.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:35:52 -0400
From:	rick@...roway.com
To:	"Huang Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	"Don Zickus" <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Richard Houghton" <rhoughton@...roway.com>,
	"ACPI Devel Mailing List" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Len Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: kernel oops and panic in acpi_atomic_read under 2.6.39.3.   call
 trace included

Hi Huang,

I've been running for a while now with this new patch.  I have not gotten
any panic output though.  This is the only output I have from GHES:

[22256.616069] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370
[102115.873369] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370
[175460.888809] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370
[223652.976925] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370
[284678.016631] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370
[321563.363578] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370
[500789.731559] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370
[539808.495653] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370
[545116.419274] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370
[686744.665292] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370

Do you think changing from 5620-5670 cpus changed the behavior?

Thanks,
Rick


> On 09/03/2011 07:32 AM, rick@...roway.com wrote:
>> Hi Huang,
>>
>> Sorry for the delay in my response.  Hurricane Irene delayed our testing
>> a
>> bit.
>>
>> I had to switch the 5620 CPUS I had for 5670s.  After 4 days of running
>> (it was usually about 2 before) I finally got this output in dmesg:
>>
>> [337296.365930] GHES: gar accessed: 0, 0xbf7b9370
>> [337296.365936] ACPI atomic read mem: addr 0xbf7b9370 mapped to
>> ffffc90013ee8370
>>
>> It is not mapped to 0 as expected, but it didn't crash now!
>
> But I don't think this patch fixed the issue.  Maybe just hided the
> issue.  Do you have time to try the new patch attached?
>
> Best Regards,
> Huang Ying
>
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ