[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4E71CAE8020000780005635C@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:52:40 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] xen/i386: follow-up to "replace order-based range
checking of M2P table by linear one"
The numbers obtained from the hypervisor really can't ever lead to an
overflow here, only the original calculation going through the order
of the range could have. This avoids the (as Jeremy points outs)
somewhat ugly NULL-based calculation here.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
---
arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- 3.1-rc6/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
+++ 3.1-rc6-i386-xen-p2m-nr/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
@@ -1721,10 +1721,8 @@ void __init xen_setup_machphys_mapping(v
machine_to_phys_nr = MACH2PHYS_NR_ENTRIES;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
- if ((machine_to_phys_mapping + machine_to_phys_nr)
- < machine_to_phys_mapping)
- machine_to_phys_nr = (unsigned long *)NULL
- - machine_to_phys_mapping;
+ WARN_ON((machine_to_phys_mapping + (machine_to_phys_nr - 1))
+ < machine_to_phys_mapping);
#endif
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists