[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110916171852.17f75ce6@wang-bj-intel>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:18:52 -0400
From: xingchao <xingchao.wang@...el.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"yong.zhang0@...il.com" <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
"Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfs: NULL pointer check
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:42:41 +0800
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com> wrote:
> On 09/16/11 10:48, Wang Xingchao wrote:
> > se maybe NULL if cfs_rq->rb_leftmost is NULL
>
> nack, it had better not be; otherwise we've got a corrupt tree!
>
> Also, this diff is against the previous -- please bundle dependent
> patches as a series in the future.
>
Got it. :)
Paul, i'd send another patch to remove the NULL pointer check
in __pick_first/last_entity().
--xingchao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists