[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1316142577.29510.130.camel@sli10-conroe>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:09:37 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
Maxim Patlasov <maxim.patlasov@...il.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
Subject: [patch]cfq-iosched: delete deep seeky queue idle logic
Recently Maxim and I discussed why his aiostress workload performs poorly. If
you didn't follow the discussion, here are the issues we found:
1. cfq seeky dection isn't good. Assume a task accesses sector A, B, C, D, A+1,
B+1, C+1, D+1, A+2...Accessing A, B, C, D is random. cfq will detect the queue
as seeky, but since when accessing A+1, A+1 is already in disk cache, this
should be detected as sequential really. Not sure if any real workload has such
access patern, and seems not easy to have a clean fix too. Any idea for this?
2. deep seeky queue idle. This makes raid performs poorly. I would think we
revert the logic. Deep queue is more popular with high end hardware. In such
hardware, we'd better not do idle.
Note, currently we set a queue's slice after the first request is finished.
This means the drive already idles a little time. If the queue is truely deep,
new requests should already come in, so idle isn't required.
Looks Vivek used to post a patch to rever it, but it gets ignored.
http://us.generation-nt.com/patch-cfq-iosched-revert-logic-deep-queues-help-198339681.html
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li<shaohua.li@...el.com>
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index a33bd43..f75439e 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -334,7 +334,6 @@ enum cfqq_state_flags {
CFQ_CFQQ_FLAG_sync, /* synchronous queue */
CFQ_CFQQ_FLAG_coop, /* cfqq is shared */
CFQ_CFQQ_FLAG_split_coop, /* shared cfqq will be splitted */
- CFQ_CFQQ_FLAG_deep, /* sync cfqq experienced large depth */
CFQ_CFQQ_FLAG_wait_busy, /* Waiting for next request */
};
@@ -363,7 +362,6 @@ CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(slice_new);
CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(sync);
CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(coop);
CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(split_coop);
-CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(deep);
CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(wait_busy);
#undef CFQ_CFQQ_FNS
@@ -2375,17 +2373,6 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfq_select_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd)
goto keep_queue;
}
- /*
- * This is a deep seek queue, but the device is much faster than
- * the queue can deliver, don't idle
- **/
- if (CFQQ_SEEKY(cfqq) && cfq_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq) &&
- (cfq_cfqq_slice_new(cfqq) ||
- (cfqq->slice_end - jiffies > jiffies - cfqq->slice_start))) {
- cfq_clear_cfqq_deep(cfqq);
- cfq_clear_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq);
- }
-
if (cfqq->dispatched && cfq_should_idle(cfqd, cfqq)) {
cfqq = NULL;
goto keep_queue;
@@ -3298,13 +3285,10 @@ cfq_update_idle_window(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,
enable_idle = old_idle = cfq_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq);
- if (cfqq->queued[0] + cfqq->queued[1] >= 4)
- cfq_mark_cfqq_deep(cfqq);
-
if (cfqq->next_rq && (cfqq->next_rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NOIDLE))
enable_idle = 0;
else if (!atomic_read(&cic->ioc->nr_tasks) || !cfqd->cfq_slice_idle ||
- (!cfq_cfqq_deep(cfqq) && CFQQ_SEEKY(cfqq)))
+ CFQQ_SEEKY(cfqq))
enable_idle = 0;
else if (sample_valid(cic->ttime.ttime_samples)) {
if (cic->ttime.ttime_mean > cfqd->cfq_slice_idle)
@@ -3874,11 +3858,6 @@ static void cfq_idle_slice_timer(unsigned long data)
*/
if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&cfqq->sort_list))
goto out_kick;
-
- /*
- * Queue depth flag is reset only when the idle didn't succeed
- */
- cfq_clear_cfqq_deep(cfqq);
}
expire:
cfq_slice_expired(cfqd, timed_out);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists