linux-kernel - Re: Improve lseek scalability v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201109161641.04321.andres@anarazel.de>
Date:	Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:41:04 +0200
From:	Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Improve lseek scalability v3

On Friday 16 Sep 2011 16:23:19 Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I sent an email containing benchmarks from Robert Haas regarding the
> > Subject. Looking at lkml.org I can't see it right now, Will recheck when
> > I am at home.
> I never saw that.
Hm. Not good. I see message in my imap folder marked as replied. I don't keep 
mail-server logs that long though...

> Thanks for the data.
Thats Roberts work though.

> > You likely won't be able to see the bottlenecks with any of the released
> > postgres versions as there are bottlenecks fixed in HEAD that throttle
> > way before that.
> FWIW we did some postgres testing on a 4 socket, but only with the heavily
> patched MOSBENCH version, which fixes various locking problems. Didn't run
> it with that patchkit though.
I don't really now what MOSBENCH changed but I think some of the fixes Robert 
are unlikely to be contained in there because they are more than just a rework 
of locking itself but algorithmic changes on another level.
(Should it interest you its its likely to be  
84e37126770dd6de903dad88ce150a49b63b5ef9, 
b4fbe392f8ff6ff1a66b488eb7197eef9e1770a4, 
3cba8999b343648c4c528432ab3d51400194e93b 
8e5ac74c1249820ca55481223a95b9124b4a4f95, ...)

I also think youre only likely to notice those problems if youre running a 
readonly test. The write-path is currently far to slow to see problems in that 
area.

Greetings,

Andres
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/