linux-kernel - Re: [linux-next] ASoC: sound/soc/samsung/neo1973

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56969.1316192529@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:02:09 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc:	Russell King <rmk+alsa@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>,
	Harald Welte <laforge@...nezx.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
Subject: Re: [linux-next] ASoC: sound/soc/samsung/neo1973_wm8753.c build failure

On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:53:04 +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen said:
> On 09/15/2011 01:00 PM, Russell King wrote:
> > [...]
> > We now have a sane policy: entries which aren't fully up to date are
> > automatically dropped.  Entries for which there is no platform support
> > file merged within 12 months of the entries last edit are dropped also
> > automatically dropped.
> 
> Partly unrelated, but what about these platforms which can be fully described
> with DT and don't need a platform file?

Then those platforms won't notice if their now-unused entries evaporate out of
the platform file, right?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped