[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110916183516.GA4121@1wt.eu>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:35:16 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>, andi@...stfloor.org,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stable patch queues and submission
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 08:23:50PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > With kernel.org being down, the stable@...nel.org list is no longer
> > working. This leaves me wondering if we should send patches directly to
> > the various stable tree maintainers with [stable] in the prefix and
> > linux-kernel CC'd, or if the stable queues are even being maintained
> > during the outage.
>
> No, please do not, unless you need something "special", and even then,
> please cc: lkml and the developers so it's not lost.
>
> > Does anyone have a preference or suggestion on how to continue stable
> > releases until the list comes back? (I'm assuming 'wait' isn't really a
> > best all around option.)
>
> Wait and continue to add the marking to your patches, my scripts are
> still running and pulling the patches out and they are going into the
> stable queue just fine. The queue just isn't public at the moment due
> to kernel.org being out.
I was thinking about an alternative if that can help. If the mails are
sent to our addresses followed by "+stable", they're easy to filter out
to another mailbox (eg: "willy+stable@....eu").
But there are a number of other reviewers on stable@k.o who provide a
lot of value with their reviews, and not having them check the patches
could easily lead to some nasty patches leaking into stable.
Regards,
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists