linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH ] dynamic_debug: call __netdev_printk only for CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110918182714.GA32615@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:27:14 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	gregkh@...e.de, joe@...ches.com, jim.cromie@...il.com,
	bvanassche@....org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ] dynamic_debug: call __netdev_printk only for CONFIG_NET

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:21:14AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/18/2011 01:27 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:18:18AM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> __netdev_printk is only defined when CONFIG_NET is set. Since we only need
> >>> __dynamic_netdev_dbg for network drivers, we can make it conditional on the
> >>> same Kconfig symbol.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Yes, I've posted a fix for this:
> >>
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/30/297
> >>
> >> Hopefully, it will be pulled in soon.
> > 
> > As that thread again spun off into confusion, can you please resend the
> > end result?
> 
> That spinning confusion had nothing to do with the posted & correct patch
> which could have been applied several weeks ago.
> 
> I'm curious:  Do you delete most of your email on a routine basis?

No, only after going through pending patches do I purge them.  And when
a series of patches generates a thread like this one, where people are
arguing over the way the macros are named, and no one seems to agree, I
will take it as the fact that this series was contentious and needs to
be resent after taking into consideration the original complaints.

For me to keep all email threads, based on the amount of email I get[1],
would be ludicrous.

greg k-h

[1]: http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/get_lots_of_email.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/