[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110918063026.GH3523@ponder.secretlab.ca>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 00:30:26 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, thomas.abraham@...aro.org,
jamie@...ieiles.com, b-cousson@...com, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:31:40AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>
> This adds gic initialization using device tree data. The initialization
> functions are intended to be called by a generic OF interrupt
> controller parsing function once the right pieces are in place.
>
> PPIs are handled using 3rd cell of interrupts properties to specify the cpu
> mask the PPI is assigned to.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/common/gic.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 10 +++++
> 3 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6c513de
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> +* ARM Generic Interrupt Controller
> +
> +ARM SMP cores are often associated with a GIC, providing per processor
> +interrupts (PPI), shared processor interrupts (SPI) and software
> +generated interrupts (SGI).
> +
> +Primary GIC is attached directly to the CPU and typically has PPIs and SGIs.
> +Secondary GICs are cascaded into the upward interrupt controller and do not
> +have PPIs or SGIs.
> +
> +Main node required properties:
> +
> +- compatible : should be one of:
> + "arm,cortex-a9-gic"
> + "arm,arm11mp-gic"
> +- interrupt-controller : Identifies the node as an interrupt controller
> +- #interrupt-cells : Specifies the number of cells needed to encode an
> + interrupt source. The type shall be a <u32> and the value shall be 3.
> +
> + The 1st cell is the interrupt number. 0-15 are reserved for SGIs. 16-31 are
> + for PPIs.
> +
> + The 2nd cell is the level-sense information, encoded as follows:
> + 1 = low-to-high edge triggered
> + 2 = high-to-low edge triggered
> + 4 = active high level-sensitive
> + 8 = active low level-sensitive
> +
> + Only values of 1 and 4 are valid for GIC 1.0 spec.
> +
> + The 3rd cell contains the mask of the cpu number for the interrupt source.
> + The cpu mask is only valid for PPIs and shall be 0 for SPIs. This value shall
> + be 0 for PPIs.
THe binding looks good, but I really think the first cell should be
the mask; followed by the irq number in the 2nd and the flags in the
3rd. That would better match with existing practice.
> +
> +- reg : Specifies base physical address(s) and size of the GIC registers. The
> + first 2 values are the GIC distributor register base and size. The 2nd 2
... first region is the GIC distributor...
... The 2nd region is the GIC cpu ...
I've only looked at the code changes superficially, but it looks good
to me.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists