[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1316332908.5814.22.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 10:01:42 +0200
From: Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Force same size of struct autofs_v5_packet on x86 and
x86_64
Am Freitag, den 16.09.2011, 18:38 +0800 schrieb Ian Kent:
> On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 11:19 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:06:38PM +0200, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> > > autofs_v5_packet is 300 bytes on x86 and 304 bytes on x86_64.
> > > This difference is wrong and leads to a hang in systemd when running
> > > a x86 userspace on an x86_64 kernel.
> >
> > NAK.
> >
> > You are talking about the userland ABI. With existing users. Changing
> > it might help systemd (what the hell is it doing with autofs, anyway?),
> > but breaking existing binaries (you know, ones that *do* have some business
> > dealing with autofs) is not acceptable.
>
> That's right.
>
> Certainly my mistake (made a long time ago) and when I realized it I
> decided I would need to handle it in user space for the same reasons Al
> has mentioned.
>
btw. where are the padding bytes are added? how to tell gcc to display
this?
with kind regards
thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists