[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110918014608.GA16198@alboin.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:46:08 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc: "jeff.liu@...cle.com" <jeff.liu@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] BTRFS: Fix lseek return value for error
> > with an additional improvement if the offset is larger or equal to the
> > file size, return -ENXIO in directly:
> >
> > if (offset >= inode->i_size) {
> > mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> > return -ENXIO;
> > }
>
> Except that is wrong, because it would then be impossible to write sparse files.
And also i_size must be always read with i_size_read()
Anyways clearly there's a problem in btrfs land with merging fixes in time.
Is anyone collecting patches while Chris is gone?
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists