linux-kernel - Re: [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E770EF5.90705@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:44:21 +0800
From:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:	krkumar2@...ibm.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
	mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl, joe@...ches.com, shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap

On 09/18/2011 03:17 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 02:02:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> A wiki-page was created to narrate the detail design of all parts
>> involved in the multi queue implementation:
>> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue and some basic tests result
>> could be seen in this page
>> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue-performance-Sep-13. I would
>> post the detail numbers in attachment as the reply of this thread.
> Does it make sense to test both with and without RPS in guest?
>
I've tested with RPS in guest, but didn't see improvements.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/