linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: BUG() dies silently

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAB-zwWi1K8y8fHzy0hgcFPgSfhMrZNfoKQ9xuU00Y1sLg6ZBmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:26:49 -0500
From:	"Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@...com>
To:	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	lak <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	lk <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: BUG() dies silently

Hi

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in> wrote:
> If the "Use generic BUG() handler" patch is only scheduled for the next
> merge window and not for 3.1, can this patch be merged instead for 3.1
> and -stable?  This problem is easily seen with GCC 4.6.

I can send it for both and let the maintainers decide.

Russell, do you give your ack?

Regards,

Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/