[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E7772A2.8010000@xenotime.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 09:49:38 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
CC: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
gregkh@...e.de, joe@...ches.com, jim.cromie@...il.com,
bvanassche@....org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ] dynamic_debug: call __netdev_printk only for CONFIG_NET
On 09/19/2011 06:48 AM, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 01:27:36AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:18:18AM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>> __netdev_printk is only defined when CONFIG_NET is set. Since we only need
>>>> __dynamic_netdev_dbg for network drivers, we can make it conditional on the
>>>> same Kconfig symbol.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Yes, I've posted a fix for this:
>>>
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/30/297
>>>
>>> Hopefully, it will be pulled in soon.
>>
>> As that thread again spun off into confusion, can you please resend the
>> end result?
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>
> Hi,
>
> Andrew Morton has pulled these into his -mm tree...so I think the series
> should be all set.
Good. The build fix is still needed in today's linux-next (20110919).
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists