[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6soJQu5Cvc+ZANVS=WXwACzG69GPGF9fAuVLDB-sUurUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:44:38 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
"marc.zyngier@....com" <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
"jamie@...ieiles.com" <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:47:18AM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>> Since the cpumask is not relevant for the SPI, maybe having two
>> interrupt controllers will be more relevant. Or maybe 3, since there is
>> some SGIs as well.
>
> I don't think anyone uses SGIs outside of the common SMP code.
> Therefore they're handled entirely separately for the root GIC.
>
> (If there's two GICs - some platforms do have two - then the SGIs on
> the non-root GIC are unused.)
...and since SGIs aren't external HW inputs to the GIC, there really
isn't any need to reflect them in the GIC DT binding.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists