[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E77827C.3030202@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:57:16 -0600
From: Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>
To: mtk.manpages@...il.com
CC: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Man page doc for SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE
On 09/18/2011 01:07 AM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> +
> +.BR SEEK_DATA
> +and
> +.BR SEEK_HOLE
> +are nonstandard extensions also present in Solaris.
Looks good to me, but you may also want to link to the proposed wording
for mandating SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA in the eventual POSIX Issue 8 (POSIX
2008 is Issue 7):
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=415
Also, it seems a shame that the kernel can fail with EINVAL instead of
properly emulating SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA even on file systems with no
underlying support for reporting holes.
--
Eric Blake eblake@...hat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists