linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: BUG() dies silently

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAB-zwWhxCJSqKkt-zTYFE2j5vXKGegYrYp2z4PnDyvurvSt0Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:32:14 -0500
From:	"Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@...com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>, Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
	lk <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	lak <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: BUG() dies silently

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> I think I'm going to have to drop the generic bug support for the time being.

In this case then my patch can targeted for 3.1 and -stable, right? I
abandoned my change because the generic bug patch was the better
solution in the long term, but if it is being delayed I can submit
mine with your blessing.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/31/490

It just forces the compiler to generate the right code through
volatile, and while at it I could fix the other similar situations
(also noted in the patch).

Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/