linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/9] Include irq and softirq fields in cpuacct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1316457505.6091.14.camel@twins>
Date:	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:38:25 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...allels.com,
	paul@...lmenage.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
	mingo@...e.hu, jbottomley@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] Include irq and softirq fields in cpuacct

On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 17:04 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> +       CPUACCT_STAT_IRQ,       /* ... irq ticks */
> +       CPUACCT_STAT_SOFTIRQ,   /* ... softirq ticks */

Would it make sense to make the cpustat thing an array as well? That way
the if forest will compute an array index and the cgroup and cpustat
parts can then use the 'same' code.

That avoids having to pass a cputime64_t* and int around for pretty much
the same thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/