linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/9] Include irq and softirq fields in cpuacct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E778C94.2060007@parallels.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:40:20 -0300
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xemul@...allels.com>,
	<paul@...lmenage.org>, <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	<daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>, <mingo@...e.hu>,
	<jbottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] Include irq and softirq fields in cpuacct

On 09/19/2011 03:38 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 17:04 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> +       CPUACCT_STAT_IRQ,       /* ... irq ticks */
>> +       CPUACCT_STAT_SOFTIRQ,   /* ... softirq ticks */
>
> Would it make sense to make the cpustat thing an array as well? That way
> the if forest will compute an array index and the cgroup and cpustat
> parts can then use the 'same' code.
>
> That avoids having to pass a cputime64_t* and int around for pretty much
> the same thing.
I think so, and I go further: I think that when cgroups are compiled in 
- by far the common case this days - cpustat should be just cpuacct for 
the root cgroup. With the right macro trickery, I can even be quite 
transparent...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/