[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1316472864-sup-500@shiny>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:55:13 -0400
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Jeff liu <jeff.liu@...cle.com>,
Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] BTRFS: Fix lseek return value for error
Excerpts from Andi Kleen's message of 2011-09-19 15:59:52 -0400:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:30:02PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > Excerpts from Andi Kleen's message of 2011-09-19 13:52:03 -0400:
> > > > Thanks everyone, I've put Jeff's last version of this in my queue.
> > >
> > > Can you post the version you merged? The previous ones all had issues.
> >
> > https://github.com/chrismason/linux/commit/48802c8ae2a9d618ec734a61283d645ad527e06c
> >
> > This was the last one sent, I thought it combined all the fixes.
>
> Ok looks good, but it will be all obsolete once my patchkit lseek
> get in (except for the SEEK_DATA/HOLE hunk)
Yeah, it's similar to yours except for the hole hunk. Your gotos are
fine by me, whatever makes your patch cleaner.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists